Our Echo
Title, story type, location, year, person or writer
 
Add a Post
View Posts
Popular Posts
Hall of Fame
Projects
Visitors
Contests
Search

SECOND-CLASS WOMEN

Story ID:3119
Written by:Dick Meister (bio, link, contact, other stories)
Story type:Musings, Essays and Such
Location:Everywhere USA
Year:2007
View Comments (0)   |   Add a Comment Add a Comment   |   Print Print   |     |   Visitors
SECOND-CLASS WOMEN
By Dick Meister

More women than men are graduating from college these days, generally with
better grades. And more women are earning advanced degrees and more going
into professional occupations. Yet, as two new studies point out, women in
the professions are still paid much less than their male counterparts.

It’s clear evidence that, despite years of attempts to win true equality
for women, even those at the higher economic levels -- one-fourth of all
working women -- continue to suffer from blatant discrimination.

The studies, by the AFL-CIO and the American Association of University
Women, show that within a year after graduating, women are earning an
average of 20 percent less than men holding the same jobs in education, law,
medicine, science and other professional fields. Those out of school for 10
years or more are getting at least 30 percent less.

Whatever the occupation, no matter how well-prepared the women, no matter
whether they outnumber or out perform their male co-workers, no matter how
creative, talented or hard-working they may be, it’s the same: Their median
pay is sure to be anywhere from $16,000 to $34,000 a year less than that of
men holding the same positions.

That amounts to about 40 percent less for female physicians and surgeons,
for example, 30 percent less for lawyers, 25 percent less for college and
university teachers.

You might think women would at least get more than men in the traditionally
female occupations that they dominate. But though more than 80 percent of
pre-school, kindergarten, elementary and middle school teachers and
registered nurses are women, for instance, they are paid about 10 percent
less than men who work beside them at identical tasks.

Since retirement benefits are based on earnings, the women’s
employer-financed pensions, Social Security payments and other retirement
earnings also are invariably below those of the men. Only about two-thirds
of professional women get any pension at all, and the median amount for
those who do is barely $6,500 a year. Almost half of professional men get
retirement benefits, with a median yearly payment of $12,000.

Despite the second-class treatment they face, increasing numbers of women
are expected to enter college to prepare for professional jobs, which
increasing numbers of them will fill. It’s predicted that there’ll be at
least 20 percent more female professionals by 2014. And that means that more
than half of those who hold some of the nation’s most important jobs will
continue to be victimized by discrimination.

Professionals aren’t the only ones, of course. Most other working women are
treated much the same, whatever their jobs. Despite the 44-year-old Equal
Pay Act, which promises women “equal pay for equal work,” their pay overall
stands at 23 percent less than that of men -- currently 77 cents for every
dollar earned by men.

Adequately enforcing the law would help. But more than that, the narrow
legal definition of “equal work” must be expanded, for all working women,
professional and non-professional alike.

Women claiming wage discrimination generally have had to prove they held the
same positions as men whose pay was higher. But though a woman’s job may be
different, that does not necessarily make her work any less valuable to her
employer and society at large than that of a man holding a different job.

What should count is not a worker’s gender or what job she holds. Pay for
women and men alike should be based on such things as how much training the
worker has had, how much education and experience, what skills, how much
effort the job requires, what responsibilities it entails, how much stress,
as well as how valuable it is to the employer.

The standard should not be “equal pay for equal work,” but the much fairer
and sensible, “Equal pay for work of equal value.”

Bills to make that standard the law have long been pending in Congress. How
many more studies must there be before they’re finally passed? How much more
mistreatment of working women?

Copyright © 2007 Dick Meister