| Story ID: | 2691 |
| Written by: | Dick Meister (bio, link, contact, other stories) |
| Story type: | Musings, Essays and Such |
| Location: | San Francisco CA USA |
| Year: | 2007 |
| Person: | Barry Bonds |
| Home | Help | Member Sign In | Create an Account |
| Story ID: | 2691 |
| Written by: | Dick Meister (bio, link, contact, other stories) |
| Story type: | Musings, Essays and Such |
| Location: | San Francisco CA USA |
| Year: | 2007 |
| Person: | Barry Bonds |
Add a Comment |
Print |
|
Visitors|
THE SCOURGE OF HOMER BALL By Dick Meister Is it finally over, the hoopla over baseball slugger Barry Bonds setting a new record for career home runs? Is there now a chance that the National Pastime will regain its status as a complex game of many dimensions rather than a one-dimensional game of home run derby? Bam! Barry blasts yet another one over the fence! Thousands cheer! Fireworks shoot high into the outfield sky! Fans’ cameras flash! Shouting! Screaming! Noise! Lots of noise! Of course, many fans like all those balls flying out of the park. Pretty exciting stuff. But damned simplistic. It’s what writer Nicholas Dawidoff described as “dumbed-down, muscle-bound entertainment” – a version of baseball that obscures the nuances and subtleties that make the game what it is. Or should be. Listen to what Frankie Crosetti, New York Yankee shortstop for 17 years, third base coach for 20, had to say about the impact homer-blasting has had on one of the game’s most important finer points: “When a player is on second base with no outs, it is the next batter’s duty, by hook or crook, to give himself up and try to advance the runner to third base. But it is seldom that a right-handed batter will try to push the ball to right field to advance the runner. And most left-handed hitters will not try to drag or pull the ball to advance the runner. “They only swing from their heels, wanting to hit the ball out of the ballpark and over the moon as well. With all these homeruns being hit, it makes a lousy game of it. The great game of baseball is going down the tube from all these home runs.” Crosetti, ironically, was once a teammate of Babe Ruth, whose prodigious home run production was largely responsible for making the once-rare homer a key strategic weapon – that and Major League Baseball’s attempt to revive fan interest after the stunning disclosure that the 1919 World Series had been fixed by gamblers. Ruth, who in 1919 hit what was then a spectacular total of 29 homers, nearly doubled his output to 54 the next year, then in 1921 bashed 59. The home run derby was on. And though it wasn’t until many years later that any player surpassed Ruth’s record totals – 60 in a season, set in 1927, and a career high of 714 – many players tried. Homers became commonplace, and baseball became Homer Ball. The illegal ingestion of steroids cited as a main reason for today’s soaring home run totals is only a recent development. Ruth and those sluggers chasing his records in the past weren’t juicing up their bodies, unless you count the booze favored by many, Ruth prominent among them. But Major League Baseball was juicing up the baseball itself, putting a more lively rubber core in the center and otherwise making certain the ball would soar farther than it ever had, even farther than the Babe himself had ever sent it. It was the beginning of what baseball historians like to call the Lively Ball Era, which got even livelier about a dozen years ago, when baseball’s fan-hungry team owners juiced up the ball even more. You can also blame the steady increase in homers since then on the new stadiums with shorter, homer-friendly distances to the fences. And blame the addition of new Major League franchises that have had little choice but to sign mediocre pitchers, given the limited number of quality pitchers available. And, of course, there are steroids. Hopefully, the reduction in steroid use sought by MLB will slow down the homer bashing that has so badly corrupted baseball. But if that’s not enough, we could demand that ballpark fences be moved back – preferably way back. Better yet would be the remedy suggested by baseball historian Hermann Muelder, who thinks home run balls hit over the fence should be declared foul balls like any others hit out-of-play. That’s perfectly consistent with the rules of baseball, Muelder notes, since “in scoring it’s not what happens to the ball that makes the score. It’s what happens to the player.” In basketball, for example, the player must put the ball through a hoop to score, but in baseball the player must cross home plate. I’d go even further than Muelder. If I had my way, anyone hitting a ball over the fence would be automatically out. A pretty drastic step, sure. But we must take drastic steps if we are to free the nation from the scourge of Homer Ball. Copyright © 2007 Dick Meister |